This prevents a graphics card from generating additional heat or noise or deflecting airflow.įinally, for the closed-loop cooler we used Corsair's H80. Since a dedicated GPU wasn't needed, one wasn't used. Using a larger enclosure felt like it might complicate things with too many variables the small and wonderfully efficient BitFenix Prodigy felt perfect for the job. Removing the middle drive cage allows for a straight shot between the Prodigy's intake and the radiator fan, allowing us the opportunity to test how quietly and efficiently the fans can run in a closed system with no real acoustic baffling, while the 200mm Spectre Pro attenuated to 5V runs both quietly enough to not significantly impact results while providing enough airflow to ensure the radiator fans can do their job. So why use a closed enclosure, and a Mini-ITX one no doubt? As it turns out, my experience in testing Origin's Chronos LAN box suggested that this might actually be ideal. Testing with an i7-2700K at stock speeds would defeat the purpose Intel's own stock cooler can handle that, we want to "separate the men from the boys" so to speak. The processor, with its healthy voltage boost and overclock, throws a pretty substantial amount of heat at our cooling system. Intel Core i7-2700K overclocked to 4.4GHz 1.4VīitFenix Prodigy with 200mm BitFenix Spectre Pro intake 5V Our test system may seem a bit unusual in more than a few ways, but stick with me and I'll explain why I put it together and tested it the way I did. If you've been keeping up with our case reviews, our testing methodology for the fans here is going to seem relatively similar in some ways.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |